O/H Karsten Wade έγραψε: > It takes a fair amount of effort to put FWN together. There is more to > being an editor than one might think, unless you have actually been an > editor-in-chief. Even an every-other-month magazine with a small staff > is going to take some full-time weeks to make happen. > > Instead, if we build up the staff of FWN, then look at growing that into > outputting a bi-monthly magazine, that has good chance of success. I > think this is a situation where we need to learn to crawl, then walk, > before we run. +1. The FWN is continually increasing its size and quality, which is great considering its publication frequency. It would be much easier for the magazine to work through FWN and every two months take a "snapshot", extract the most important past artcles, add up some guides, images, interviews, statistics. Doing it through FWN is like spreading the editing work in the whole 2 months instead of 2-3 weeks at the end. The content base would be bigger and of higher quality (more contributors, more eyes to edit). A magazine like this will bring a lot of energy to all our marketing/news efforts, and why not start again the Interviews thing (/wiki/Interviews). -d -- Dimitris Glezos Jabber ID: glezos@xxxxxxxxxx, GPG: 0xA5A04C3B http://dimitris.glezos.com/ "He who gives up functionality for ease of use loses both and deserves neither." (Anonymous) -- -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
