On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 20:53 -0500, Gian Paolo Mureddu wrote: > If anything about Fedora I do not agree with (keep in mind I'm a > die-hard-supporter and fan of the distribution) is precisely the name. > Not because of anything else, but because Red Hat *deliberately* > depleted the word of meaning... So others wouldn't be "confused", but > that actually turned out to be even more confusing. I admit this whole thing has confused me, as well. I think it was less a situation of "choice" and more one of "organic growth." We had moved ahead with the merger of RHL and Fedora.us into a single project, picked a name, and put a distribution out with that name, before anyone noticed we had created the "hat" problem. Remember Hanlon's razor: "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon's_razor - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
