On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 19:23 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: > In the article referenced below there is an (implied) call to action for > Fedora: > > "One might well wonder why certain Fedora users feel the need to repeat > these complaints so often. Perhaps the project is not doing an adequate > job of communicating what it is trying to do. One assumes that, if > people understood what Fedora is, they would not complain about it not > being something it can never be." > > Is this true? > > What are we doing to get this message out? > > What can we do better? > > Etc. > > I can blog all I want, but if it's only the choir who is reading, then > what? > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > From: Matt Domsch <matt@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Check out LWN.net for today's weekly edition. Subscribers (and I do > encourage folks to subscribe) will find it interesting. Non-subscribers > should look at this: > http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/230042/5181766fe793aa6b/ > > > - I think we spread the word enough its just people choose not to listen. Without actually placing it on their desktop and making a user click 'I understand this contains no propietary software' I don't know what else needs to be done. Is there enough information relating to fedora as to how to bypass the propietary codecs etc.. and use open source alternatives? Regards, Marc
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
