Re: fedora legacy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 19 December 2006 14:18, Matthew Miller wrote:
> It's not fair to blame the volunteers. There wasn't the right
> infrastructure for volunteers, either. Chicken and egg. Possibly someone
> awesome and energetic could have seized the project and ran with it (as
> Jesse did to start it), but that's a lot to hope for and too much to count
> on.

I don't believe the infrastructure was all that much of a problem.  People who 
came to me with interest in helping out got access to the tools to help out.  
Some learning curve, but not much.  Other people helped with filing bug 
reports, or testing packages.  Even those dropped off, which is a telling 
sign.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)

Attachment: pgpwUC4zoLWeC.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux