it seems that Thorsten cann't send directly :-( -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht -------- > Von: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > An: Gerold Kassube <gerold@xxxxxxxx> > Kopie: Fedora-Ambassadors <fedora-ambassadors-list@xxxxxxxxxx>, > Discussions on expanding the Fedora user base > <fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Betreff: Re: Meeting minutes of the FAD > Datum: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 21:39:27 +0100 > > Hi All! > > Gerold Kassube schrieb: > > the last weekend, we had our first FAD (== Fedora Ambassador Meeting) in > > EMEA. > > We had nice and productive days for the Fedora Ambassador Project and we > > proudly present to you what we have done and dicussed. > > > > All information which we like to announce can be found at > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAD/PassedFADs > > I was invited hearty to the FAD, but I could not visit it due to private > matters. But Gerold asked me to look trough the posted docs and give a > short feedback to the list, so here I am: > > "Ambassadors from Red Hat should show more commitment to the Fedora > ambassadors project" -> I agree mostly -- especially in the beginning > and in countries/areas where a local group of Ambassadors is not yet > working properly that's needed until the baby steps are done and a group > has grown up. Yeah, I know, that's often quite some work. BTW, the > german ambassadors seems to be a good example where a bit of Red Hat > involvement helped a lot. > > "dying Fedora Weekly Reports" -- that would be sad, I liked the idea, > the format and the content a lot, but I have no time to help there :-/ . > Why can't we merge fedoranews.org and the weekly reports? That would be > a step in the right direction. Sure, the stuff from fedoranews.org can > write about nvidia, ati or 3rd party add-on repos. But most of the stuff > that written there currently isn't like that and would be fine for > fedoraproject.org afaics. fedoranews.org could continue with reporting > the stuff that is forbidden for fedoraproject.org (as a add-on or > something like that). And ahte weekly reports need to be annouced > properly... > > "Gerold: There should be better communication with leading departments > of different projects to other ambassadors" -- Agreed, we all (Core, > Extras, marketing, ambassadors, ...) don't talk enough with each other. > I think we need a fedora-project mailinglist (or something like that) > where we can discuss such stuff more together. Stuff like > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-desktop-list/2006-November/msg00039.html > could be discussed there, too. At the same time need to get rid of some > other lists and put some serious thoughts info a > mailinglist-cleanup/reordering. Or morph fedora-maintainers into > fedora-contributors and open it for all fedora-contributors. > > "there should be no global vote for FAMSCo, but vote per region." -> > related, not that important and just FYI: there was the plan in > fedora-extras to get contributors more involved by letting them vote on > important stuff and not only on a committee. But that's just a rough > idea for the long term. http://www.cs.cornell.edu/w8/~andru/civs/ could > be a help there if we don't want to maintain the voting mechanism ourselfs. > > "Ambassadors Mailing List closed to non-ambassadors but archives opened" > -- why not a readonly variant just like FAB uses -- reading the archives > trough the mailman web-interface or by downloading mboxes sucks. > > "Joerg: There was recently press contact demands and german ambassadors > helped." -- we really should have local contacts for the press > documented properly in the wiki as that quite important IMHO. > > CU > thl
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
