Le vendredi 01 décembre 2006 à 14:36 -0500, Steve Barnhart a écrit : > On 12/1/06, Diego Búrigo Zacarão <diegobz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm disagreement to names [debian/ubuntu]-likes. :P > > I think that we must have our own way to nominate the Fedora Releases. > > Something different... ;) > > > > Maybe: > > * Fedora Sever Linux 7 > > * Fedora GDesktop Linux 7 > > * Fedora KDesktop Linux 7 > > * Fedora XFDesktop Linux 7 > > Unfortunately, I am in disagreement to your choice of names. Not only > is that confusing to many users, but how exact would you pronounce > that? If its actually pronouncing the letter and then desktop that > sounds dumb. There's no need to complicate things. Keep the entire > distribution Fedora and perhaps just keep counting up like we've been > doing or maybe what Gentoo does with the years, that's a good idea imo > also. So we could have either Fedora 7, Fedora Linux 7, or something > like Fedora 2007 and then .1 .2 etc. We have a chance here : Fedora Core 7 will be out in 2007. What about sticking to years now ? Fedora 8 will come out in 2008 ? And name the releases according to it : Fedora Linux 7.1 for the spring release and Fedora 7.2 for the autumn release. What we can see in the fedora development is that it seems to have a major release every year or so, followed by a more polished one. FC2 was a polish release of FC1 FC4 ... FC3 FC6 ... FC5 Then we can expect FC7.1 being a major release, and FC7.2 being a polish release. -- Thomas Canniot http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ThomasCanniot -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list