On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 14:33 +0300, Rino Mardo wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: fedora-marketing-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:fedora-marketing-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf > > Of Karlie Robinson > > Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 11:31 AM > > To: fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: We made the distrowatch weekly > > > > but not in a good way > > http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20061106#phr > > > > The most eye catching issue I always read is about pirut. Then someone would > always suggests yumex for features users are looking for not in pirut. If > that is the case, why not make yumex the default? I believe the idea is that pirut follows the GNOME HIG. Yumex is a great application for people who want to tweak their package installations, but for the 80-90% case where the user just wants the latest updates, pirut satisfies those needs. You could make the same argument for just about any set of purposed applications. Ultimately a sane and simple default is required. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Project Board: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board Fedora Docs Project: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
