Apple today is not the Apple of 2004 or early, Apple now can be considered more Microsoft like than *nix like. I agree with those that considered to use Ubuntu instead of Apple Operating System but i think that Mac Os X and Ubuntu are different: the first one is a multimedia station, the second one is a productivity station. On 8/20/06, Rahul <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Marc Wiriadisastra wrote: > http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2006/06/ubuntu_linux_a_threat_to_mac_o.html > > I'm sure you will find this an interesting read. One of the things that > I found quite interesting is that apple seems to be alive and well. > > I personally don't know anyone that run apple computers so I was > surprised by the statistics however. I find it quite disheartening the > analogies that were presented. > > Are we missing something? or how should I put am I missing something? > Is ubuntu that much better than fedora? If it is why is it? I know its > a personal opinion but what specifically about it? > > Anyways would love others points of view. > I am not sure associating being searched more to better is the right idea. We have had seen similar discussions on google trend search results too but I cant find out any common agreement on what that really means. Rahul -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
