Don't flame me, just making an observation and voicing an opinion ( and we all know about those ). I typed the following terms into google and hit "I'm feeling Lucky" and this is what I felt about the results.. "mandriva" - Looks clean, but driven by a marketing team. "centos" - Perfectly functional to me. "ubuntu" - Neat, clean, works. "suse" - Pretty good, typical corporate site. "xandros" - Much the same comment I have for Suse. "yellow dog" - And again, but more slick. "knoppix" - Lots of penguins, not pretty, but info and download links are easy to find. "slackware" - Very basic, which suits what slackware is actually. "turbolinux" - Easy enough to find what I need, not the nicest looking by far though. "red flag linux" - Works for me. "redhat" - Nice, good layout of information, get quickly into the area I want. "debian" - Not pretty at all, but works. "fedora" - Without doubt the most disappointing, and least exciting result of the bunch. Of the fedora sites I tend to lean towards fedoraproject.org being the nicest, fedora.info coming in second, while fedora.us is down for me so I can't tell. I tend to think the same as Bill Hicks when it comes to marketing but it would be nice if Fedora was better represented. Is anybody working on perhaps improving the situation or would this be deemed low priority / unimportant ? Cheers. -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
