On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 09:52 +0000, Jon Fautley wrote: > Max Spevack wrote: > > > I'd be interested to hear your thoughts and reactions. Let me know what > > you think, and whether or not you thing the new www.redhat.com/fedora > > does a good job of providing a window into the heart of the Fedora Project. > > One question - wasn't one of the main goals of the Fedora Foundation to > differentiate between "Red Hat" and "Fedora" as two seperate entities? > > "redhat.com/fedora" - this is even more 'Red Hat' than > 'fedora.redhat.com'. Is Fedora a part of Red Hat now? I don't agree; this is no more "claiming" Fedora than any "example.com/fedora" link. Keep in mind this page has always been there, and it's a way to drive people looking for Fedora support at Red Hat to head for the community sites instead. There is no escaping that people *associate* Fedora with Red Hat, nor is that particularly a bad thing. > P.S I know Fedora and Red Hat are different, but this isn't how it looks > to an 'external' person (I'm writing this email because I've just had an > IM from a friend reading "So are Red Hat taking back Fedora then?") This snippet might be more meaningful if you could ascertain how he arrived at this conclusion. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
