On 3/16/06, J. Hartline <jasperhartline@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Well, not many people would have the FC5 final yet. > That is besides the point of the question. > > The point of the question is why are you building and trying to > distribute "90GB" > of buggy software packages that have updates from a development tree, > rather than build something that is > deemed stable/fixed. Do you know how many of those packages have had > high priority security updates? > Fedora Core 5 is right around the corner. Well I start over again the discussion we had before: Whether its FC5 or FC5T3, it doesn't matter that much, since FC5 is not yet released. 1. it is a beta LiveCD release in English that many ambassadors requested to me 2. to know what features are lacking in our livecds: e.g. eject upon reboot/halt , autologin ..... 3. WE CANT MAKE A FEDORA OFFICIAL LIVECD ALL A SUDDEN we have to know what is the FEDORA COMMUNITY demanding ? 4. prepare SUITABLE materials for Fedora Ambassadors and add THEIR favorite packages (we have to know all these) ..................... Mether, did explain last time on Livecd list i think Chitlesh -- http://clunixchit.blogspot.com -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
