-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Patrick Barnes wrote: > I think the appropriate way to allow migration is simple: > > Instead of the generic "No MP3 here" message, point to a URL on the > wiki. This URL can detail why we don't have MP3, what the > alternatives are, and where they can look for more information > about MP3 on Fedora. We are very limited in the wording we can > use, and we can't provide direct information to give people MP3 > support, but we can point them to third-part sites that have that > information. I'm confused... Why can't we provide direct information, even when it involves using a third party tool? I mean is not like Fedora is endosing any illegal activities or anything of the sort by pointing to a legi source like Real Player... I don't understand why can't that be said straight. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEFJT+XM+XOp70dwoRAnsxAJ9nQsWPULYEAdHrNXtdXKYy2x3OsgCfQgFO pPwhe7ceWmgNknkeZkUq1qw= =KXrp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
