-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > >> Yes, but will there be GNOME 2.14 packages for FC4 while it still >> is "current" and not moved to Legacy, like what was done with >> KDE? >> > Unlikely. This is exactly what I don't understand, would the same apply should Fedora be based on QT and KDE for those packages too, then? > >> I mean, the common reason given to NOT provide GNOME update >> packages usually is the ammount of system files or interactions >> that GNOME has, I wonder if KDE does not have such issues, >> wouldn't it then be a problem with GNOME's design, then? >> >> > Thats a question for the development lists. I guess I'll post this on the desktop mailing list rather than the main devel list, as it is a direct desktop issue more than a distro-wide issue (well... mostly). > It would be better to ask in the development lists or the > maintainer. > >> Has KDE already moved into Extras? >> > No it has not. Such plans are very much undecided. Ahh, I read about this discussion som weeks ago, and I was kind of surprised, actually. > >> Because in that should free up some hands to improve on GNOME (or >> am I getting this totally wrong?). >> >> Sorry if my comments don't make any sense to anyone but me. >> >> >> > From the development as well as user perspective, what applies to > package X does not always apply to package Y. I understand that's not always the case, is just that the recent move to KDE 3.5 and no next GNOME packages got me thinking. That's all. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD3wCyXM+XOp70dwoRAkHSAKCFRPZdSMNJOCwJxA18+ReaIpLFMACdF0sr GwgmmAXeBB+2zI/21G3gfnk= =jYIf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
