Re: development cycle (Was: Re: What's New in Fedora Core 5 Test2 (LWN): Some comments)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 10:25 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> 
> While we are at the topic already: This fact was badly communicated.
> There seems to be a whole lot of confusion about the current Fedora
> release cycle in the community -- for example the german
> wikipedia-writers have a long discussion about it and nowhere can find a
> *official* statement [*1] that the nine month cycle for FC5 was only a
> exception:
> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diskussion:Fedora_Core#6_Monate

I'm confused.  Wasn't our original and still official release schedule
every 6-9 months?  Hasn't every release thus far fallen in that time
frame?  Won't FC5 fall in that time frame (albeit on the far side)?
Where is the confusion coming from?

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux