On Thu, 2005-12-29 at 06:39 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Alex Maier wrote: > > >Didn't we decide to go monochrome? I mean no color extensions? > > > I didnt see any such discussions anywhere in this list. I remember a discussion about this long ago, but no ultimate decision. In any case, here's my vote for no color extensions. At one time I dug this idea, but after more careful consideration, I think they're distracting and interfere with the unity of the project. The blue color is a distinctive thematic element, and I think swapping it for every subproject is a mistake. Simply changing a name that appears under the word "fedora" would be a better idea. I think trying to incorporate some additional graphic element referencing the subproject name is probably also a bad move, because it would make the resulting amalgam too busy. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
