-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 12:59 -0600, Gain Paolo Mureddu wrote: > >> Didn't know whether to ask this in another thread or not, but >> here goes all the same. >> >> Is there any updates to the guidelines for use by system builders >> to be able to ship Fedora systems with some Fedora Extras >> packages from the get go? > > > I am meeting with Greg tonight to go over this. Hopefully we can > come up with a guideline that is reasonable for all parties > involved and present to Legal. From that point we can discuss > alterations and changes to future revisions of the guideline if > necessary. > Thank you very much, I eagerly wait for any results... We've been working like crazy to bring this project into realization from the documentation to schematics for hardware layout and stuff, to these legal aspects. We want to get this right from the start rather than make adjustments later on (which will be pretty much inevitable), but we'd like to be in full compliance from the very start. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDleHyXM+XOp70dwoRAv+AAJ90Lyi5B1QaQluMffDkThmHBTSqeACZAcC2 RlBex5uvyC+k2U+1U7dkpZE= =ypyP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
