On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 13:40 -0500, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote: > 1. Continuing to host mailing lists at Red Hat. This is the easiest > option, and considering that Red Hat sponsors lots of mailing lists, no > big deal, really. We've got a good infrastructure for getting them > created relatively quickly. This seems like the best to me. As you say there is lots of infrastructure, and past has proved that RH can allow non@redhat people administrate the lists. It also ensures the same sort of look/feel of all the lists involved. > 2. Move mailing lists to fedoraproject.org. Other than independence from > redhat.com, what does this buy us? What is this independence from > redhat.com worth? And is Seth even willing/able to maintain this? Seems this would just be a perception thing. There may be cases where software upgrades might happen quicker, but I don't really know if that is a real issue or not. Also it puts a lot of expectation on Seth. I'd want to wait until there is more resources surrounding fedoraproject.org before wholesale cutover. But thats just my opinion. > 3. Have mailing lists anywhere and everywhere; whoever wants to set up a > mailing list can set up a mailing list, and we can link them all and note > them as "authoritative project list" or not as we see fit. I don't like this idea at all. Decentralized, difficult to aggregate, user non-intuitive, etc... -- Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
