Yeah. Clarifying the position of Fedora Extras is a clear goal.
I'd like to be able to say:
Any distribution of FC + any strict subset of Extras == official Fedora
Any distribution of FC + other stuff (maybe + signed agreement, depending)
== based on Fedora
--g
_____________________ ____________________________________________
Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have
Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent. the
Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the
] [ dumb. --mcluhan
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 07:47:00PM -0500, Gain Paolo Mureddu wrote:
> > Yes, this kinda brakes the "keep it simple" objective... In any case,
> > from what I gather even delivering Fedora Extras packages can be
> > considered non standard.
>
> If that's the case now, that *must* be changed in the clarified/additional
> rules being worked on.
>
> --
> Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/>
> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
>
> --
> Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
> Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
>
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
