+1 I agree if people had been following the issues well they we would know the hat issue has been gone over a few times and that its been decided that its not to be used. Marc On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 15:22 -0400, Jeremy Hogan wrote: > On 9/21/05, Greg DeKoenigsberg <gdk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > We wanted enough input to validate the direction the logo > should take. > The mechanism we used to gather that input was the Fedora > marketing list. > Why? Because this is *precisely* why the Fedora marketing > group exists. > And yes, that *necessarily* excludes 99% of the Fedora > community -- but it > *includes* the 1% who care enough about the direction of > Fedora's brand to > get *directly* involved. > > +1 > > And not only that, but this particular issue is not up for broad > debate, or a referendum, since RH marketing and legal have to make the > final call. So inviting a mass of folks to contribute, only to find > out that they didn't get their way, or that their input could be > considered would have made them even madder. > > Besides, we don't need the other 99% of the community telling us it > should be a blue hat. ;-) > > --jeremy > > > > > -- > Fedora-marketing-list mailing list > Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
