I believe it has already been established that there will be no hat. However there should be some art. The logo should not appear to have been created using a vector based 2D CAD application with color fill. And where is the warmth? On Tue, 2005-09-20 at 13:37 -0400, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote: > Heh heh heh! So it's hit the masses with full force! > > "The logo isn't at all appealing. Looks very amateur. No offence but > according to the Wiki project, it's been getting rave reviews? Someone > hand me a baseball bat. I'm no designer but this is way off." > > "As lukewarm as I am about the current proposals, have you seen some of > the other ideas put forward? Yikes!" > > "I prefer the Blue Fedora hat." > > "The 'attractiveness' component is lacking. Maybe more rounded, more > attractive colors, etc. It looks too much like broken links." > > So Matt, more grist for the mill. At this point I think we're pretty far > down the acceptance path, though. > > --g > > (p.s. I understand that there's a lot you can do with fonts.) > > _____________________ ____________________________________________ > Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have > Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent. the > Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the > ] [ dumb. --mcluhan > -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
