Christopher Aillon wrote: > On 09/10/2005 09:37 AM, Colin Charles wrote: > >> I'd like to discuss: >> >> FedoraMyths - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraMyths >> How can we use this further, and get it somewhat Red Hat blessed if we >> need to >> > Drive-by feedback: > I see a whole bunch of negative items in bold, and then the word FACT > in bold right underneath it. Someone quickly skimming will get the > wrong idea. Highlight the positive as a contra to the negative. > Don't highlight the negative assuming people will read the rebuttal. > The current appearance of the document is largely dictated by the perspective and the form of the wiki. The 'myths' are the focus of the document. Dispelling them with the facts is its purpose. It is not meant to be read by drive-by reviewers. People who view the page are looking for reasons. That said, I will try to go back and improve the contrast to better highlight the facts. -- Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes nman64@xxxxxxxxx www.n-man.com --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
