Re: Logo -- let's move on ... the legal loophole of "Fedora(TM)" for Red Hat

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 22:54 -0500, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
> If I'm "throwing a wrench" into the Fedora Foundations plans by bringing
> this out, DON'T SHOOT THE MESSENGER!  In fact, something like this makes
> me wonder if I shouldn't send an e-mail to Brooks over at eWeek, or
> write an article myself for any one of the publications I regularly
> write for?!
> 
> Now if it is Red Hat's intent to "license" the trademark "Fedora(TM)"
> but state that they name has no relationship to an illustration of the
> same term, that _might_ be something.  But it really seems ... well, how
> can I put this ... "legally weird" in my experience.  ;->

"dude" please get legal council before dumping this kind of crap on in a
publication.

-- 
Jesse Keating RHCE      (geek.j2solutions.net)
Fedora Legacy Team      (www.fedoralegacy.org)
GPG Public Key          (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
 
Was I helpful?  Let others know:
 http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux