On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 17:37 -0500, Patrick Barnes wrote: > Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > >If their gripe is that they can't play mp3s, only giving an explanation > >of why is telling them "Tough luck" which is a pretty unfriendly > >response. An telling why plus information that we've thought about the > >problem and there are solutions is "We hate the situation too but we're > >doing what we can to not get sued and provide you with the multimedia > >capabilities you desire." > > > >I think my addition makes this second point. If no one thinks it's > >problematic, I'll commit it. > > > I've made a few small changes. Check it out now and see if you feel it > does a better job. I still want to avoid duplicating information > presented on the ForbiddenItems page, but I can certainly agree with > your points. > Much better. I changed the last couple lines to mention ForbiddenItems has ideas that may aid in finding third-party plugins (while continuing to plug the OSS alternatives). See if you agree with the change. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
