Re: fedora websites

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Generally speaking:

* Individual project owners are responsible for individual project pages.

* Legal is responsible for the trademark content.

* For lack of any clearly defined owners, I might just as well be
considered the "owner" of everything else.

--g

_____________________  ____________________________________________
  Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have
 Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent.  the
             Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the 
                     ] [ dumb.  --mcluhan

On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Matt Frye wrote:

> On 8/11/05, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Matt Frye wrote:
> > 
> > >Let's do it then.  Who's responsible for f.r.c?
> > >
> > Hold on a minute. Fedoraproject.org needs to be revamped...
> 
> I meant that in a general sense of approval, rather than "do it now." 
> Moving "real" pages on f.r.c would be coordinated with whoever is
> responsible for them, so who is that?
> 
> In any case, http://fedoraproject.org/mockup/ has some pretty nice design.
> 
> --
> Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
> Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
> 

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Kernel Developers]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Gimp Users]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux