On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 13:49 -0500, Patrick Barnes wrote: > I understand your concerns, but I do not share them. The *Group page > structure is defined, but not reserved. MoinMoin will not change > existing behavior of the *Group pages. Ah but you had mentioned that future may bring more functionality to the Group pages... > Having the page existing as a > measure for future ease does not risk brokenness. Yes and no... I'm just of the mind set that using things out of scope tends to get you burned. *shrug* > As for ACL usage, the > only changes that would be necessary would be the addition of ACLs to > the *Group page to prevent tampering, and then the addition of ACLs to > pages that are to be restricted. It would not be necessary to touch > every page. Right, I meant every page to be limited must be touched, and touched by an admin. > If ever ACLs are used, it will likely only be applied to a > small subset of pages. By having this page now, we allow the creation > of controlled pages within minutes, and without risk. Your concerns are > certainly warranted, and the thought you have given to it is certainly > appreciated, but I have reviewed the issues and feel that this is the > best way to go. If someone wants to overrule me on this, I welcome > their comments, but I really don't see this as a problem. I just have a > habit of preparing for the future, and think this is how to do it. I will leave it up to others to decide as well. Your views and mine are now of public matter (: Neither are incorrect in their own rights, it's just a matter of opinion. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (http://geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (http://www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
