On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 19:45 -0400, Jack Aboutboul wrote: > Nothing is understood because there is no information yet. > Personally, > I think the announcement was made prematurely. Then again, I really > have no idea if it was, since we don't know how much has or has not > been > done or decided. Or instead of saying 'There is now a Fedora is being transferred to the Fedora Foundation', what should have been said was 'We are working to create a Foundation to transfer Fedora to'. That way we aren't totally surprised when the transfer happens and claim that we weren't warned.... > > I'd like to suggest that the legal people working on the FF creation > use > > the Fedora Marketing Project as a mouthpiece. > > Although I don't think we will be operating under the auspices of > Fedora > Marketing Project. It will more likely be the marketing division of > the > Foundation. Either way, I think the MORE information made public here, the BETTER. We have an opportunity to un-black a lot of eyes by being nice and verbose, can we take advantage of it? Pretty please? > > Do the work here first to > > help people understand, and let us help distribute the > understanding. > > Nod. Multiple times over. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (http://geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (http://www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
