2009/11/10 AW <arne_woerner@xxxxxxxxx>: > hi! > > i made this review request > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533976 > because linden labs dont publish a 64bit version of their viewer, > and because my box seems do be too weak for the 32bit version, > and because i believe that others might have the same problem... > > but: > 1. they certainly cant review it without a download-able package... > 2. it seems like they dont like tar balls with binaries > (they prefer a script that transforms the original sources and then builds the binary?) > > is it easy to make a SRPM? > i could unpack the source packages again and then locate files that i patched manually and create patch-files for the patch(1)-tool... is that the right way? Yes thats the right way. Actually it is called "pristine source principle". You always use the unmodified upstream tarball and add your patches with the spec file with the %patch macro so it becomes transparent what has been changed, when building rpms. kind regards, Rudolf Kastl > > did somebody do it already for secondlife? > > bye > arne > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails. > http://mail.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-games-list mailing list > Fedora-games-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-games-list > _______________________________________________ Fedora-games-list mailing list Fedora-games-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-games-list
