On Wednesday 05 July 2006 17:00, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> Does not following this rule sound reasonable / any objections? > > > > Would it make sense to have ode-opcode, demo-effects-opcode, > > crystal-space-opcode etc packages? That is, split the opcode part > > into a seperate subpackage that does not require the main package, and > > if one project can use another's opcode it can do so? > > Erm, no I think the effort needed to make that work is not worth the gain. +1 > Regards, > Hans -- []'s Eitch http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/ "Talk is cheap. Show me the code." - Linus Torvalds _______________________________________________ @xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-games-list
