My only recommendation would be to send your changes upstream when you're done so that they can potentially incorporate them into the code. --Mike Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi all, > > Well since no one has commented on this I'm going to implement things as > described below. > > Regards, > > Hans > > > Hans de Goede wrote: > >>Hi all, >> >>Quoting myself from: >>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188625 >> >>--- >> >>Before I forget the ugly name is because there are 2 alogg libraries out >>there, one which is called just alogg and one which is called AllegroOGG >>but still use alogg as soname. I hope we never need the other alogg >>otherwise I see a problem, but with this name atleast its clear which >>alogg this is: >> http://lyrian.obnix.com/alogg/ >> http://nekros.freeshell.org/delirium/alogg.html >> >>--- >> >>Thanks for the review! I've not imported this sofar, because the fact >>that debian has the other alogg packaged worries me, this means that the >>other one is used by some free software too, so sooner or later we will >>need to package it too. I think I'll just start packaging the other one >>right away so that I can find any conflicts now and come up with a >>resolution, before a bunch of packages depends on one or the other. >> >> >>--- >> >>So there we are 2 different ogg support for use with allegro support >>libraries both installing: >>/usr/lib/libalogg.so >> >>One of them installs: >>alogg.h >> >>And the other: >>alogg/alogg.h >> >>Which also seems like an accident waiting to happen. I'm thinking of >>solving this by: >>-give AllegroOGG a new soname: libAllegroOGG.so, or should I give them >> both a new name, and in that case what should I use for alogg? >>-putting all the header files of both in seperate dirs under include: >> /usr/include/allog/(alogg/alogg.h) >> /usr/include/AllegroOGG/(allogg.h) >>-modifying allog-config todo the right thing for alogg >>-use pkgconfig for AllegroOgg >>-patch AllegroOGG using programs to use pkgconfig. Currently only raidem >> can use AllegroOGG (I have a new version ready which adds ogg support >> as a replacement for the stripped out mp3 support, giving raidem its >> background music back). >> >> >>So does this sound like a plan if not, what do you suggest? >> >>Regards, >> >>Hans >> > > > _______________________________________________ > > @xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-games-list