On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 21:44 -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote: > On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 18:19 -0400, Warren Togami wrote: > > Jon Escombe wrote: > > > Warren Togami <wtogami <at> redhat.com> writes: > > > > > >> I'm sorry that this isn't working out for you. It worked very well for > > >> me and a few other testers. Nobody complained about these problems > > >> about this version sitting in rawhide for quite a while now. > > > > > > Just one small issue to add, this update segfaulted for me due to a clash with > > > the beta5 version of gaim-meanwhile that's still in extras. Possibly ought to be > > > a dependancy somewhere that required an update to the plugins too? > > > > > > Appreciate that this would be hard to spot unless you actually use the meanwhile > > > plugin, so not really complaining, just fyi (& hoping for an updated plugin at > > > some point ;) > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Jon. > > > gaim-meanwhile as a separate package will disappear when the distro > > merges, because then libmeanwhile will be available for gaim to build > > against. > > That's nice but, in the meanwhile (gag - sorry), we're screwed? I just > suddenly slammed into gaim segfaulting and went searching and found the > previous message. I can now confirm that, once I removed gaim-meanwhile > and gaim-meanwhile-ibm (some internal configs for IBM people), gaim now > comes up clean. But I don't have access to my Sametime accounts, now. > Which means I've got to get sanity (a standalone Sametime client) up and > configured until this bolux gets shot and straightened out. It's broken > right now. I already said I was fixing it. > > I guess it needs to be punted over to the Extras folks to straighten > out. I don't see anything on that list as of yet (adding a cross post - > sorry). Has this been filed in bugzilla for gaim-meanwhile in the > meantime? No, but I'm fixing it. josh -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
