Re: Why aren't R packages noarch?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 10:57:03AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Other that installing in /usr/lib/R on i386 and /usr/lib64/R on x86_64, there appears to be no difference between an R package on the two architectures. It seems to me that they should be made noarch and put into /usr/share/R instead.

Comments?  Note that I am completely new to R....

Some R packages are truely arch; But noarch packages should indeed be in
/usr/share  (like perl and python noarch packages), but maybe this
means changing R too much?

I am also very new to R.

--
Pat


We'll see. Filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=231220 to ask.

--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager                     303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division                    FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                  orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Boulder, CO 80301              http://www.cora.nwra.com

--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux