Re: sdcc - Cross Compiler, Needs Packaging Standards?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Warren Togami wrote:
> Warren Togami wrote:
>>
>> BuildRequires: auto-grab-source
>>
>> %prep
>> %setup -q
>> GRAB_SOURCENAME=glibc-2.5-fedora-20061008T1257.tar.bz2
>> GRAB_HASH=6aa114e3cde495c267ff8a6e55b90bec
>> GRAB_NAME=glibc
>> auto-grab-source $GRAB_NAME $GRAB_SOURCENAME $GRAB_HASH
> 
> It could be even simpler than this.
> 
> BuildRequires: auto-grab-source
> Source#: sources
> 
> %prep
> auto-grab-source glibc
> auto-grab-source gcc
> auto-grab-source binutils
> # auto-grab-source reads the sources file for filenames and hashes
> # needs %%{name} parameter because that isn't specified in sources
> %setup -q
> 

I kinda like this, except that I think auto-grab-source might just as
well be an rpm macro, currently its too small IMHO to be in its own package.

That still leaves the question is this too evil for the many MB's it
will safe? Just like you Warren I honestly don't know. Do you know
anyone we could ask? Maybe we should ask the FPC to rule on this?

Regards,

Hans



-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux