On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 18:30 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:
> Jason L Tibbitts III wrote :
>
> > >>>>> "MS" == Matthias Saou <thias@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > MS> What's the rationale behind this?
> >
> > Picking a single value that meets the technical requirements so that
> > package reviewers can be spared unending confusion over whether a
> > particular buildroot is sufficient and unending argument between
> > packagers and reviewers which wastes everyone's time.
> >
> > It takes all of two seconds to fix it.
>
> Changing it doesn't "fix" anything. If we have to pick something for the
> short term, then I'd suggest this :
We have picked one for short term, namely that which had been used for
most packages in FE.
> * Mandatory : The BuildRoot must start with
> %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}. The preferred value is
> %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n).
^^^^^^^ This ^^^^^^
> And that's it for now. Let the real fix come in later.
Right, yesterday we (FPC) tried to come up with a better proposal,
but this "ad-hoq" approach meanwhile went up in smoke, because it has
shown to be broken.
Ralf
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
