On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 15:46 +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > On 2/13/07, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 13:57 +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > > > [giallu@molzilla ~]$ rpm -q Inventor > > > Inventor-2.1.5-24.fc5 > > > [giallu@molzilla ~]$ rpm -ql Inventor > > > [snip] > > > /usr/lib/libInventor.so.0 > > > /usr/lib/libInventor.so.0.0.0 > > > [snip] > > > > > > is this made intentionally? > > > > I don't understand - Could you elaborate? > > > > I meant the 0.0.0 triplet used as version. Is that right/usual to have? There is nothing wrong in using "libXXX.so.0.0.0" for a library using an SONAME of "libXXX.so.0", accompanied by a symlink "libXXX.so.0" pointing to "libXXX.so.0.0.0". > In the meanwhile, I spotted a problem in the spec file: around line > 220 there are 4 install commands like: > > install -d m755 > > instead of > > install -d -m755 Thanks, will fix in CVS. Ralf -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
