On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 09:23 +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Ville Skyttä wrote: > > Apologies if I missed the announcement, but based on the above list of > > breakage I'm not alone even within Fedora maintainers, let alone elsewhere. > > The packages were intended to be pushed out alongside each other, I built > libmtp and I instructed gauret (Amarok maintainer) to rebuild and built > gnomad2 immediately afterwards, however the build of libmtp was pushed > before our builds were done. > > The actual question here is how do we coordinate package builds with > pushing of builds in a good way? Communication - Direct email, bugzilla. If necessary introduce compat-packages. > What we want to do is group three > packages (libmtp, gnomad2, amarok) and not push any one of them until all > three are built. This would totally solve this kind of nasty problems. co-maintain them, give other maintainers privileges to rebuild the packages when all agree upon such step? Having a build-system which requires maintainers to "give explicit clearance before a package is being pushed to the public"? Ralf -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
