Re: RFC: FAS E-mail == Bugzilla E-mail?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Warren Togami (wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> Implementation
> ==============
> 1) Most users are already fine.
> 2) Those users who do not yet match, they have the option of either:
>    a) Change their FAS e-mail address.
>    b) Change their Bugzilla address. (this requires a one-time change 
> by dkl in the Bugzilla database)
> 
> Benefits
> ========
> - owners.list contains FAS account names instead of arbitrary e-mail 
> addresses.
> - Those account names can be directly used by the VCS ACL
> - Simplified view in Package Database
> 
> Key question
> ============
> Is this an unreasonable requirement?  Please comment.

The public availability of bugzilla e-mails has caused people to
use specific e-mail addresses for that (presumably for spamtrapping);
they may not want to use this for general Fedora mail.

FWIW, the account<->bugzilla discrepancy applies to all of 8 users,
at the moment. So I'm not sure how critical it is.

Bill

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux