Re: Extras i386 rawhide rebuild in mock status 2007-01-30

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 20:04:12 +0100
Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx (Axel Thimm) wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:59:01AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > Extras Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for i386 Tue Jan 30 08:16:22
> > CST 2007
> > 
> > Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
> > 
> > Total packages: 2606
> > Number failed to build: 113
> > Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 2
> > Leaving:  111
> > (there may be some duplicates if rawhide has 2 versions of a
> > package)
> > 
> > Of those expected to have worked...
> > Without a bug filed: 111
> 
> I checked some of the packages assigned to myself and found that
> xmlto/sgml-common currently fails in rawhide, so any package building
> docs that way is currently breaking and giving false negatives.

Possibly this bug I filed last night? 
Or related?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225370

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux