Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 21:13:54 +0100, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote: >> On 2007-01-26 20:26:59 +0100, Ville Skyttä wrote: >>> On Friday 26 January 2007 21:11, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote: >>> >>>> A thing which makes me worry and could be a reason for that is a fact >>>> that during import package was treated as "isomaster-0_7-2_fc5" (when I >>>> build src.rpm fc5 was added due to "%{?dist}" in the Release tag (I >>>> removed it only from a file name), but I though it is normal - I was >>>> using FC5 to build it). >>>> >>>> What can I do to fix that? >>> Just bump the release tag to 3%{?dist} for all branches and proceed as usual. >> Thanks, simple solutions are often hard to find out. >> >> Btw, I want to import another package into FE. Is it normal procedure to >> import src.rpm, bump version and retag? Or I made something wrong in my >> first import and a fc5 tag on a devel version was caused by that? > > I recommend using cvs-import.sh _only_ for the very first import to > "devel". For all updates, just use plain cvs commands plus the > Makefile targets ("make tag", "make build" --> "make help"!). I did that (0.7-3 was tagged without problems). I used cvs-import.sh only for initial import to CVS (which made wrong tag). Version with correction was made with commands that you mentioned. I wrote above about my another package (fuse-smb) and its initial import to devel. Building another src.rpm (without %{?dist}) only for import (I know it's only done once per package) is very artificial. Regards Marcin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list