Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:05:40 -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote: [...] >> The development repo does have libgpod-0.4.2, so I'm not sure why >> repoclosure is complaining. > > Simply because at the time it was running, the development repo did > only have libgpod-0.4.0-2.fc7 > > repomd.xml from 07-01-16 04:40:15.000000000 -0500 Thanks for clarification Michael. As far as getting things fixed for FC6, can anyone point me at the current process for moving things from updates to updates-testing (this is for Core I know, but I'm hoping it's documented someplace). The best link I've found on the wiki is: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/IdealWorkflow Is this what's planned for F7 and beyond or does it reflect the current process? The relevant part I'm interested in seems to note that the current process to move from testing to final is depending on the package maintainer doing it manually. If that's true, I'd ask AlexL to do that then. Thanks for any help. Sorry for pushing a package with broken deps. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ====================================================================== We are not to expect to be transported from despotism to liberty in a featherbed. -- Thomas Jefferson
Attachment:
pgplBX6AvazRz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
