Gianluca Sforna wrote:
On 1/18/07, Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thursday 18 January 2007 00:38, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 00:13 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> > are these two licenses ok for packages in fedora/extras:
> > | This software is in the public domain. Permission to use, copy,
modify,
> > | and distribute this software and its documentation for any
purpose and
> > | without fee is hereby granted, without any conditions or
restrictions.
> > | This software is provided "as is" without express or implied
warranty.
> >
> > from http://www.fourmilab.ch/xd/
>
> Yes, Public Domain is GPL Compatible, Free.
To be sure you did not read over it, the "without fee" requirement in
the text
above is not a problem?
Of course, IANAL, but I read it as they are giving anyone those rights
without asking a fee in return. That is, the "without fee" not being
part of the restrictions but of the granted rights.
I agree, they clearly state its Public Domain and thats a well defined
legal term.
Regards,
Hans
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list