On Tuesday 16 January 2007 16:24, Denis Leroy wrote: > Hmmm, so why is a binary-incompatible version of libburn being pushed so > late in the lifetime of FC-6 ? I have a package (brasero) that doesn't > compile with libburn.so.6. This is a somehwat careless dependency > breaking, it's not hard to check what packages are dependent on this... Oh wow, I had no idea that anybody was actually using libburn. My bad. Upstream really wanted to get the new libburn/libisofs out as they've made a lot of improvements. Since we don't have any sort of updates-testing for Extras, I built it for rawhide and let it sit there for a bit. Nobody complained, so I built the update for FC-6. Guess I'll do a repoquery next time. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpdpfNu3CBVz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
