On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:11:42 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > These 2 were already build at the time the script ran, but not pushed Yup, that happens > any chance the script could be ammended to catch this, I think yes... > or should I just ignore false positives like these two? I'd say just ignore them. This is mostly a heads-up thing. There are always some transitional things. If the warning sticks for several weeks, then I'd start to get worried. Regards, C -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list