Hi, I am reviewing a game for which there is some fuzziness regarding the license of the included game data (the game itself is under the GPL). To quote upstream: "Concerning the license on the original data files: (basically everything in data/) The literal meaning of the release statement is ambiguous in the case of the original data that is included in the released package. Despite several attempts to get a clarification, we have received no response. We have chosen to interpret the original release statement as putting the original data under a GPL license. Since in the absence of a license the released data could not be distributed, we find that interpreting the license for the data as being under the same license as the source to be the best interpretation to fit the intention behind the release." Is this acceptable? The review can be found here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221065 Cheers, -Francois -- This message is subject to the CSIR's copyright, terms and conditions and e-mail legal notice. Views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the CSIR. CSIR E-mail Legal Notice http://mail.csir.co.za/CSIR_eMail_Legal_Notice.html CSIR Copyright, Terms and Conditions http://mail.csir.co.za/CSIR_Copyright.html For electronic copies of the CSIR Copyright, Terms and Conditions and the CSIR Legal Notice send a blank message with REQUEST LEGAL in the subject line to CallCentre@xxxxxxxxxxx This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
