On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 13:44 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > Hi, > > top posting on purpose: The thread about whether and how people should > or should not issue fedora-package-announce [SECURITY] announcements > drifetd to discussing about who's allowed to edit other people's > specfiles for fast reaction etc. and faded out. > > The true item of Hans' query remains: Should Fedora Extras security > announcements be sent to fedora-announce-packages or not? And if yes, > who writes/sends it, the packager, or is it relayed to a special > person/group? > > I checked the wiki and found no template to use, if I were to do so > now I would simply pick the latest announce (from Hans) and modify it > accordingly. But I'm not sure this is even wanted. > > If the packager, or someone else, is to do these announcements it > would be nice to have such an announce template in the wiki. > > BTW this is no academic exercise, I'm queuing in mediawiki upgrades to > fix a XSS Ajax issue, and would like to know whether it will be a > stealth upgrade, or whether I should start shouting. I'd very much like to see packagers do this. And I think it makes a lot of sense in the new merged world too. As for a template, I have no idea. Pick one for now and we can figure that out later josh -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
