Rex Dieter wrote: > Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 00:10 +0100, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote: >>> Hello >>> I'm suspecting a leakage in the FE guidelines concerning .la for >>> kcontrol plugins. >>> >>> kcontrol plugins require .la files in order to work properly. >>> Example: >>> 1) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221733 >>> 2) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=221015#c7 >>> >>> I think that these guidelines should be properly documented in that >>> perspective. Any comments on this ? > >> Sorry, I got busy after figuring out just the arts piece of this puzzle. >> I have some time right now to go through and fix things to not >> require .la files. However, I know nothing of the kde project so I need >> a little bit of advice. >> >> * Do you think this work would be appreciated upstream or accepted >> within the Fedora kde packages? > > upstream? Highly likely not, since kde-3.5.x is pretty much in strict > maintenance mode now. See also related upstream bug (with patch), marked CLOSED/WONTFIX: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139445 Regardless, the patch included there looks appealing. -- Rex -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
