Jesse Keating wrote : > On Sunday 31 December 2006 09:51, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > Yeah, probably -- and some are from freshrpms afaics. > > > > Is it really worth the effort to search for all those informations? > > Yes, EVERY package must have an accountable review. This is the only way > we'll be able to trust the package repository for downstream projects, > otherwise each downstream project will need to do its own package reviews to > ensure quality. Fully agreed. Does anyone want to review all the packages that came from freshrpms and never got a proper formal review? I'm pretty sure some things have slipped through... Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora Core release 6 (Zod) - Linux kernel 2.6.18-1.2835.fc6 Load : 2.47 1.66 1.56 -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
