Rahul Sundaram schrieb: > Anticipating the upcoming merge of Fedora Core and Extras I have been > removing the references to Fedora Core and replacing it with appropriate > terms throughout the wiki but I would need suggestions on how to handle > pages within the /Extras namespace. Would moving them to /Packaging > make sense? Can we considering dropping the ACL's in the packaging page > and just add a note on top that changes needs to be handled by the > packaging committee? +1 for moving most of the stuff to Packaging/ (¹) . But we need to make sure that the Review Guidelines and the other stuff thats remains protected by ACL's get moved to their own namespace, too ( /Packaging/Guidelines/ for example). The frontpage for that namespace IMHO need a clear statement why there are such restricted ACL's. With this scheme we further could clearly differentiate between general packaging stuff (/Packaging/) and the stuff that's maintained by the Packaging Committee (/Packaging/Guidelines/*). @Spot/Packaging Committee: Does that sound sane for you, too? BTW, I doubt those ACL's are useful (actually, I think they hurt) -- I prefer if all contributors can make small changes everywhere. The people that maintain those guidelines should watch those pages closely via subscription in the wiki; if someone does something bad somewhere it's easy to revert and bring it up in a meeting. But well, that the buisiness of the Packaging Committee, so who am I to complain... CU thl (¹) -- maybe it might be a good idea to wait with it a bit more until we roughly know how the new merged Core and Extras world is governed. I'll post some thoughts about it later to FAB -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
