On 04-Jan-2007 17:25.14 (GMT), Dave Jones wrote: > > E.g. we could get rid of all the ugly > > gtk-update-icon-cache calls in package %posts and instead have incron > > monitor /usr/share/icons/* and trigger the icon cache update in that > > way. > Indeed, this does actually sound like it could be useful for a number of things. Only if it has proper job locking (or triggered execution at the end of a yum transaction). If two packages update one after the other, and, say, a scrollkeeper-update is already running from the previous update before it's called again, you could end up in an inconsistant state fairly quickly. -- rob andrews :: pgp 0x01e00563 :: rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
