Re: Summary - Broken dependencies in Fedora Extras - 2007-01-04

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04.01.2007 11:22, Fedora Extras repoclosure wrote:
New report for: giallu AT gmail.com

package: kmod-sysprof - 1.0.8-1.2.6.19_1.2891.fc7.i586 from fedora-extras-development-i386
unresolved deps: kernel-i586 = 0:2.6.19-1.2891.fc7

package: kmod-sysprof - 1.0.8-1.2.6.19_1.2891.fc7.i686 from fedora-extras-development-i386
unresolved deps: kernel-i686 = 0:2.6.19-1.2891.fc7

package: kmod-sysprof - 1.0.8-1.2.6.19_1.2891.fc7.x86_64 from fedora-extras-development-x86_64
unresolved deps: kernel-x86_64 = 0:2.6.19-1.2891.fc7

package: kmod-sysprof-PAE - 1.0.8-1.2.6.19_1.2891.fc7.i686 from fedora-extras-development-i386
unresolved deps: kernel-i686 = 0:2.6.19-1.2891.fc7PAE

package: kmod-sysprof-kdump - 1.0.8-1.2.6.19_1.2891.fc7.x86_64 from fedora-extras-development-x86_64
unresolved deps: kernel-x86_64 = 0:2.6.19-1.2891.fc7kdump

I think we should we exclude kmods in devel from the dependencies check. The kernels in rawhide change quite often and thus we'll have kmod-packages with missing kernels quite often until we have a automatic solution that rebuilds the kmods when a new kernel get pushed....

CU
thl

--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Backpacking]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux