On 04.01.2007 11:22, Fedora Extras repoclosure wrote:
New report for: giallu AT gmail.com
package: kmod-sysprof - 1.0.8-1.2.6.19_1.2891.fc7.i586 from fedora-extras-development-i386
unresolved deps:
kernel-i586 = 0:2.6.19-1.2891.fc7
package: kmod-sysprof - 1.0.8-1.2.6.19_1.2891.fc7.i686 from fedora-extras-development-i386
unresolved deps:
kernel-i686 = 0:2.6.19-1.2891.fc7
package: kmod-sysprof - 1.0.8-1.2.6.19_1.2891.fc7.x86_64 from fedora-extras-development-x86_64
unresolved deps:
kernel-x86_64 = 0:2.6.19-1.2891.fc7
package: kmod-sysprof-PAE - 1.0.8-1.2.6.19_1.2891.fc7.i686 from fedora-extras-development-i386
unresolved deps:
kernel-i686 = 0:2.6.19-1.2891.fc7PAE
package: kmod-sysprof-kdump - 1.0.8-1.2.6.19_1.2891.fc7.x86_64 from fedora-extras-development-x86_64
unresolved deps:
kernel-x86_64 = 0:2.6.19-1.2891.fc7kdump
I think we should we exclude kmods in devel from the dependencies check.
The kernels in rawhide change quite often and thus we'll have
kmod-packages with missing kernels quite often until we have a automatic
solution that rebuilds the kmods when a new kernel get pushed....
CU
thl
--
fedora-extras-list mailing list
fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list