Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 06:42:55PM +0100, Ralf Ertzinger wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 18:27:49 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote > > > > > Copyright (c) 1993-2006 Ken Martin, Will Schroeder, Bill Lorensen > > > All rights reserved. > > > > [...] > > > > That's BSD, isn't it? > Almost, I wish it would fint the BSD templates to not even have to > ask. But at the very least this part is not found in any BSD licenses > AFAIK: > > * Modified source versions must be plainly marked as such, and must not be > misrepresented as being the original software. > > I don't know if that makes that non-open or non-free, but it misses > the OSI templates ... :( The LaTeX project public license has similar terms <http://www.latex-project.org/lppl/lppl-1-3c.html>, the FSF considers version 1.2 and 1.3a of that license "free but GPL-incompatible" <http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html>, so I'd guess it falls in the same category. OSI is silent on this. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
